Does Ideology Matter in Bankruptcy? Voting Behavior on the Courts of Appeals

نویسندگان

  • Jonathan Remy Nash
  • Rafael I. Pardo
  • JONATHAN REMY
  • RAFAEL I. PARDO
چکیده

This Article empirically examines whether courts of appeals judges cast ideological votes in the bankruptcy context. The empirical study is unique insofar as it is the first to examine the voting behavior of circuit court judges in bankruptcy cases. More importantly, it focuses on a particular type of dispute that arises in bankruptcy: debt-dischargeability determinations. The study implements this focused approach in order to reduce heterogeneity in result. We find, contrary to our hypotheses, no evidence that circuit court judges engage in ideological voting in bankruptcy cases. We also find, however, non-ideological factors—including the race of the judge and the disposition of the case by lower courts—that substantially influence the voting pattern of the judges in our study. The Article makes three broad contributions. First, it indicates that bankruptcy voting is comparatively non-ideological, at least at the level of the courts of appeals. Second, by identifying the influence of certain nonideological factors on voting behavior, the Article suggests avenues for profitable future research. And third, the * Professor of Law, Emory University. ** Professor of Law, University of Washington. We are grateful to Joanna Shepherd Bailey, Christina Boyd, Clifford Carrubba, Anthony Casey, Theodore Eisenberg, Lee Epstein, David Hoffman, Stefanie Lindquist, Katherine Litvak, Adam Malawi, Jeffrey Staton, Alexander Volokh, and Kathryn Watts for helpful suggestions and discussions. We also benefited greatly from the commentary of participants at the 2011 Annual National Conference of the Midwest Political Science Association (especially that of Wendy Martinek, who served as a commentator on the paper), the 2010 Conference on Empirical Legal Studies at Yale Law School (especially that of Edward Morrison, who served as a commentator on the paper), the 2010 Annual Meeting of the Canadian Law and Economics Association at the University of Toronto Faculty of Law, the 2010 Annual Meeting of the Midwestern Law and Economics Association at the University of Colorado Law School, and faculty workshops at Emory University School of Law, the University of Richmond School of Law, and the University of Washington School of Law.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Bankruptcy “Reform” in Congress: Creditors, Committees, Ideology, and Floor Voting in the Legislative Process

Both ideology and interest group interventions are important in voting on bankruptcy legislation. Roughly 15 votes in the House appear to have been changed directly through interest group pressures proxied by campaign contributions. Many more could have been changed if resources could be fully devoted to spot purchases, but most contributions appear to have been aimed at maintaining legislation...

متن کامل

Ideological Consistency and Attitudinal Conflict: A Comparative Analysis of the U.S. and Canadian Supreme Courts

According to attitudinal theorists, justices on the U. S. Supreme Court decide cases largely on political preferences that fall within one dimension of ideology. The focus of this study is to test whether a unidimensional ideological model explains the voting behavior of Canadian Supreme Court justices (1992-1997). The factor analysis results in three areas of law, two of which have never been ...

متن کامل

An empirical analysis of constitutional review voting in the polish constitutional tribunal, 2003–2014

Different theories have been developed, mainly in the context of the United States, to explain judicial decision-making. In this respect, there is an important ongoing debate over whether judges are guided by the law or by personal ideology. The analysis of the decision-making in the Polish Constitutional Tribunal seems to support the existence of some party alignment. It is to say that judicia...

متن کامل

Double voter perceptible blind signature based electronic voting protocol

Mu et al. have proposed an electronic voting protocol and claimed that it protects anonymity of voters, detects double voting and authenticates eligible voters. It has been shown that it does not protect voter's privacy and prevent double voting. After that, several schemes have been presented to fulfill these properties. However, many of them suffer from the same weaknesses. In this p...

متن کامل

Get in Line: Chapter 11 Restructuring in Crowded Bankruptcy Courts

This paper tests whether Chapter 11 restructuring outcomes are affected by time constraints in busy bankruptcy courts. On average, total bankruptcy filings rise by 32% during economic recessions, leaving bankruptcy judges with far less time per case exactly when financial distress is worst. Using the passage of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act (BAPCPA) in 2005 as an e...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2014